The Scottish Government has
announced that it is to abandon the idea of directly elected health boards in
favour of a return to appointees who can be removed my ministers. A bold
attempt at introducing a small element of local democracy has been strangled by
government that is increasingly prone to centralise services and undermine
local democracy.
In the 2007 election, the SNP
pledged to introduce elected health boards, citing concern that health
authorities had not always properly listened to local views when considering
changes to services. Scottish Labour also agreed to support the pilot elections
held in Fife and Dumfries and Galloway in 2010, in which 16 and 17-year-olds
were allowed to vote for the first time.
The turnout was low, with fewer
than one in five voting in Dumfries and Galloway, and one in ten in Fife.
However, this was the first time people were asked to vote and there was only
limited promotion. An independent assessment of the pilots found
that it is possible to successfully hold direct elections for NHS health boards
and members of the public are prepared to stand in considerable number. It also buried myths about politicisation, although
it also found that elected members were more willing to challenge officials. No
wonder the health establishment was so opposed!
Now Health Secretary Alex Neil has
capitulated to those interests, he said: "This pilot project was designed
to ensure that the views of local people about their NHS are heard effectively,
and to encourage them to be more involved in how the health service is run.
These pilots have demonstrated that the most effective approach was a
pro-active approach from boards to advertising and recruiting to posts. I am
confident that these new measures will help to increase public engagement and
improve local accountability. I am confident that these measures will help to
increase public engagement and improve local accountability more effectively
than when we tested direct elections as part of the pilot."
Sadly, there is little evidence to
support this view. Officials and the health establishment’s patronising top
down approach to public engagement has eventually worn the new health minister
down.
Of course directly elected health
boards are not the only way of extending local democracy into NHS Scotland.
Other options include greater local authority involvement up to and including
the creation of unitary authorities. Reform Scotland has recently argued for the merging of councils and health boards. However, they also argued for fewer and more remote councils. A point well argued by Lesley Riddoch in the Scotsman, who points out that we have the most remote local democracy in Europe. Its not apathy, wrong size governance is to blame.
No comments:
Post a Comment